Skip to main content

White supremacy and russophobia!


The evolution of xenophobia against Eastern Europeans in Western Europe, particularly through the lenses of colonial white supremacy and neo-imperialism post-Cold War, is a complex and multifaceted phenomenon rooted in historical, economic, and geopolitical dynamics. This survey note aims to provide a comprehensive analysis, drawing on academic sources and historical evidence to trace the development of these attitudes.

Historical Roots: Enlightenment and the Construction of Eastern Europe

The intellectual foundations of xenophobia against Eastern Europeans can be traced to the Enlightenment period, as elucidated by Larry Wolff in his seminal work, Inventing Eastern Europe: The Map of Civilization on the Mind of the Enlightenment (Inventing Eastern Europe: The Map of Civilization on the Mind of the Enlightenment). Wolff argues that Western European philosophers, viewing the continent from the perspective of Paris, deliberately cultivated the idea of Eastern Europe as backward and semi-civilized. This construction was not merely geographic but cultural, portraying Eastern Europeans, particularly Orthodox Slavs, as superstitious and inferior, laying the groundwork for racialized stereotypes. This intellectual framework, influenced by secular rationalism and latent Christian biases, shaped a lasting perception of Eastern Europe as "Europe but not Europe," as noted in reviews of Wolff's work (Inventing Eastern Europe: The Map of Civilization on the Mind of the Enlightenment).

Imperial Rivalry and Economic Disparities

The 19th century saw imperial rivalries between Britain, France, and Russia, which significantly contributed to racial biases against Eastern Europeans. The Crimean War (1853-1856) is a key example, where Britain and France, in competition for trade routes and influence in the Black Sea region, portrayed Russians as uncivilized threats to Western prosperity. This economic lens, rooted in imperial ambitions, marginalized Eastern Europeans, framing them as lesser within a fractured concept of whiteness, despite shared European identity. Historical analyses, such as those found in Imperial Rivalry with the Russian Empire (Imperial Rivalry with the Russian Empire), highlight how these rivalries reinforced stereotypes of inferiority, particularly viewing Russia's agrarian economy as backward compared to Western industrial powers.

Western Supremacy and World War II

Leading up to World War II, Western supremacy evolved, with Britain and France leveraging their imperial dominance to further marginalize Eastern Europeans. This period saw the intensification of economic and racial hierarchies, exacerbated by the Great Depression, which heightened competition for resources and xenophobia. The US, emerging as an economic power, adopted and amplified Western racial attitudes, notably through the 1924 Johnson-Reed Act, which restricted Eastern European immigration while aligning with Anglo-Saxon supremacist ideals. This transatlantic convergence fueled Nazi Germany's anti-Slavic policies, linking Western prejudices to the war's genocidal extremes, as seen in the exploitation of Eastern European labor and territory. Research, such as Nazis and Slavs: From Racial Theory to Racist Practice (Nazis and Slavs: From Racial Theory to Racist Practice), documents how these views classified Slavs, including Poles and Russians, as "subhumans" (Untermenschen), planning their extermination through policies like Generalplan Ost.

Anticommunism and the Cold War Era

Post-World War II, anticommunism significantly reinforced racial biases against Eastern Europeans. The association with the communist threat, particularly after the Iron Curtain divided Europe, led to increased discrimination in immigration, employment, and social settings. Research suggests that Eastern Europeans, including those from non-aligned countries, were perceived as "off-white blacks," highlighting a complex hierarchy within whiteness. This interplay of ideological and racial dynamics during the Cold War, as discussed in Racism, the Highest Stage of Anti-Communism (Racism, the Highest Stage of Anti-Communism), offered insights into historical and contemporary attitudes, with anticommunism amplifying historical prejudices.

Formation of the European Union and Identity-Building

The formation of the European Union (EU) post-Cold War significantly shaped racial biases. EU identity-building, through initiatives like the euro and Schengen Agreement, created an "us vs. them" dynamic, reinforcing historical biases against non-EU Eastern Europeans, casting them as cultural and political outsiders. Meanwhile, economic migration from Eastern EU countries to richer Western states initially fueled xenophobia, with migrants stereotyped as low-skilled or criminal. Over time, integration and cultural exchange softened these biases, as Eastern Europeans became seen as part of the broader "European" family. However, as noted in Race, racialisation, and the East of the European Union: an introduction (Race, racialisation, and the East of the European Union: an introduction), the EU's internal unification mitigated some intra-EU racism but hardened external divides with the non-EU East, underscoring the complex evolution of race and identity.

Economic Precarity and Rise of Nationalism Post-2010

The economic precarity in the EU following the 2010-2012 Greek debt crisis led to the rise of right-wing nationalism, feeding on anti-Eastern sentiment, including anti-Russian biases. Research, such as The impact of the financial crisis on European attitudes toward immigration (The impact of the financial crisis on European attitudes toward immigration), suggests that economic downturns correlate with more negative attitudes towards immigration, with Eastern Europeans often scapegoated. This nationalism was further fueled by US-led anti-Russian propaganda post-2014, aligning with EU efforts to solidify identity during the crisis, as seen in analyses like Central Europe’s Faceless Strangers (Central Europe’s Faceless Strangers). An unexpected detail is the resistance from pro-Russian right-wing parties like Hungary's Fidesz, highlighting internal EU divisions.

Conclusion

The evolution of xenophobia against Eastern Europeans in Western Europe is a tapestry woven from historical constructions, imperial rivalries, economic disparities, and geopolitical tensions. From Enlightenment ideas to modern economic crises, these biases have been perpetuated and transformed, necessitating a nuanced understanding to address contemporary challenges.

Key Citations

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Restricted

      The earth moves beneath you, suddenly! And the void grows, fast! You struggle to find hold, Anything, whatever it maybe..!    But there's only emptiness, air! That reaches your hands, and feet! The heart races, the body twitches, While the darkness just keeps growing..   You refuse to see the truth, the light! That you are lost, and falling! Falling fast and deep, Into the void, you were always scared of!    But you wonder, If it's the void, Or being pushed to it, Unexpectedly, but "lovingly" That hurts most!      

Fighting the Imaginary Demons

I wanted to write more comprehensively about the video I posted a bit ago where Zizek was claiming that Hillary is in fact more dangerous than trump. But like many other things I consider doing, I know I will never get to that, so thought I'd clarify some of the thought that went behind my agreeing with Zizek's argument -- to a certain extent, at least. So, this is just an outline of what I think, and in no way a proper argument, since, well, this is not an argument where I bring facts and examples. Though you are welcome to look more into the idea if you are interested. Also, keep in mind that this is exclusively coming from somewhat Marxist perspective. Hence the end goal is creating a classless society by building strong coalitions among the global working class First, here's the (video)[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b4v...]. My argument related to the video is that Hillary represents a real problem which perpetually creates the likes of Trump, and hence liberals...

Books I have read

Lately, I was trying to remember some Russian novels that I have read, and realized that it is a really hard thing to do. So thought to have some kind of a record, and here we are. You are welcome to leave a comment on anything, or may be recommend a book. Mother - Maxim Gorky (Sinhala) (Yakada Pravahaya) - ( ---) (Sinhala) Three years - Anton Chekov (Sinhala) (Sara Bhoomi) - (---) (Sinhala) Dr. Zhivago - Boris Pasternak (English) And Quite Flows Don - Mikhail Solokhov (Sinhala) My Universities - Maxim Gorky (Sinhala) How The Steel Was Tampered - Nicolai Ostrovsky (Sinhala) A Story Of A Real Man - Boris Polevoi (Sinhala) The Iron Flood - Alexander Serafimovich Popov (Sinhala) Tom Sawyer - Mark Twain (Sinhala) Huck Finn - Mark Twain (Sinhala) David Copperfield (Sinhala) Lorna Doone (Sinhala) Heidy - Johanna Spyri (Sinhala) Animal Farm - George Orwell (Sinhala) '1984' - George Orwell (Sinhala) Space Odyssey 2001 - Arthur C Clark (Sinhala) 2010 - Arthur C Clark (Sinhala) 2064 - A...

What's next for occupy

With the winter approaching, the momentum and the buzz about the occupy movement is dwindling and thus calls for an evaluation of it's goals tactics, and of course, success. The Neoliberal policies that have captured most of the world today have created a crisis of the middle class. The dwindling middle class has created social instability and with the occupy movement, the people's resurgence against these systematic problems has come into the spotlight all over the world. If one expects to change things for the better, a re-formulation of tactics is needed to benefit from the heightened momentum of the occupy movement, and it needs to be done fast. The expectation of most liberals seems to be that this momentum will bring the democratic party to the power with a progressive political base, and that would lead to better reforms. I agree with that 'expectation' and think that will be a win for the occupy moment and the people in general. However, is...

Over the Atlantic

I stood in front of you, On a dimly lit cobble street, Under the gaze of a stranger, A friend, A friendly stranger. We stood, not too close to each other    that your breath would touch my skin,    whishper in my ear,    Or breeze past my chest hair. But we stood not too far from each other,    that I could still see your green eyes,    even under the dim flickering light,    and feel,    layers of happiness, guilt, freedom, gratitude,    Sorrow, ambition, strength and love. And we stood still.    Not too close that the scent of your hair,    the scent of you,    would overwhelm my senses,    Conjure up memories,    Of waves and white sand,    Rocks and Rivers,    Yoghurt and yeast,    Of Screams of excitement, and screams of frustration,    Or of Cigarettes and sex....