Skip to main content

What's next for occupy


With the winter approaching, the momentum and the buzz about the occupy movement is dwindling and thus calls for an evaluation of it's goals tactics, and of course, success.

The Neoliberal policies that have captured most of the world today have created a crisis of the middle class. The dwindling middle class has created social instability and with the occupy movement, the people's resurgence against these systematic problems has come into the spotlight all over the world. If one expects to change things for the better, a re-formulation of tactics is needed to benefit from the heightened momentum of the occupy movement, and it needs to be done fast. The expectation of most liberals seems to be that this momentum will bring the democratic party to the power with a progressive political base, and that would lead to better reforms. I agree with that 'expectation' and think that will be a win for the occupy moment and the people in general.

However, is that the only thing to expect?

Given the reasons to the present global crises and the boom-bust cycles we have experienced in the past, we are compelled to seriously rethink the validity of the core arguments in our economic system. While race, as in the post below, is tightly dependent on the economic system, most other problems we face today in both economic and moral stand point, are even more intrinsically bound to the capitalist system. This global crises thus creates an avenue to discuss the validity of a capitalist system. As one of my physics friends claimed, "Capitalism is where the lowest potential for humanity is, given the human nature". To my non-sciency friends, this means that it is inevitable that we end up in a capitalist society. The reason implied here is the selfishness and drive to self preservation ultimately takes us to a capitalist society.

But is that true? are humans by their nature selfish? I think we can do better, and if we want to build a society that we can make people realize the value of humanity, we will be happier. Happier, not only as a society with less people dying of hunger, and less people having depression, but as individuals who see the happiness as less related to material wealth, but more related to one's inner self.

I think we need to dream about such a world.
Our demands on banking regulations, limiting campaign financing, public education and/or universal healthcare, are just small steps in that sense. And if we have a greater dream, then we can formulate the steps to get there better, and more effectively. One of the most important facets most people tend to overlook in OWS is the aspect of community building. Most people see putting up a tent and staying in a urban part as a worthless act. However, one reason behind camping, music, discussions and all the 'weirdness' in OWS is that it is an avenue to get together as a community. 

Importance of the occupy movement lies here, it is not just a grass roots movement to protest the current system and change certain aspects of it. It is a movement that calls us to first realize who we are and  how capable humans are, before thinking how better a world we can build. That is the goal I expect from OWS, and ourselves.

Can't finish without this..



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

"There have never been a Revolution without a starving mass"

Politics that advocate taking power is doomed for failure, and toxic, maybe!   In  Snipers in the kitchen ", @MonederoJC examines the failures of the leftist movements across Central and South America. He talks about how centers of power, which are very much intact after a populist leftist movement takes power, align to undermine and defeat the leftist project. "Snipers" he refers to are these institutions; mass media, the judiciary, police/military, and of course, the market forces -- the capital, and their minions, the traps laid in every corner of the house. The 21st century repeats are only a stone's throw away from where ever one is, from Syriza, Corbyn, Chile to maybe whatever the whole left-progressive thing in the US was ? At the end of the day none of these movements garnered enough momentum to make a dent in the power structures that they fought to defeat. I think we are much deeper in 💩 than just not having powerful popular institutions though (i.e The Ma

Amon Goeth in Schindler's list and pardoning the devil.

I finally watched it. I was attached to the movie the full three hours, was deeply disturbed by the imagery of the real events that was happening touched by the show of humanity and ended the movie with tears. Great movie... Yes! (Though, it wasn't a great movie, no. I want to write about that too, on a different post). While there were many scenes that are brilliant in many ways, one act puzzled me very much and I think was just pure genius. That is the scene where Amon Goeth kills the boy who was cleaning his bathroom bowl. Here's the last part of it... In the outset the scene portrays the devilish commander killing an innocent boy who think he was pardoned. But I think the scene goes far beyond that. It shows how Amon exercises his new found interpretation of power, power to pardon, in its ultimate sense by pardoning himself. Showing that he finally truly understand the meaning of power, the ultimate power yielded only by God, to pardon a person as villainous as he is

Free Will, And the direction of Collapse, The

🚬 was good! But was it? Am I better than? A break, a swim around the lake,  With thoughts, with clouds...  Done better than that, could I have not? ⚠️ But It's all physics, right! ... right? I am but some star-dust. Dead, a long before.. But am I? 🚫 🙊 well what would that 'I' do, Next? This bunch of gore and light! Well, 👆 is all just Physics,  ⚡| ➡️ ? I mean I feel that I am, Like I feel that I choose! But why , you say it weak , when that's  all that I am? But is it. what. I. am? Can 'I' be not, but i be conscious? Can that not be what 'real' freedom is? But would that not be free (the) will, But not be free-will?  So maybe 'I' must exist for free will, but not free will, for i But what do I know of a life without, So pardon me, for the halts,  - by 'I'